Judging Criteria

Teams must demonstrate the following in their pitches:

Convincing framing of problem (20%)

Teams need to demonstrate that the problem is specific and well-defined, with evidence or research supporting its importance.

  • Is the specific social issue and pain point clearly defined?
  • What evidence or research demonstrates this problem’s significance and scope?
  • Who are the stakeholders affected by this problem, and how?
  • What existing solutions have been attempted and why have they been ineffective?
  • Does the project address the root causes rather than just symptoms?
  • Why does this problem deserve attention now?

Prototype/ demo (20%)

Team must demonstrate a functional prototype or demo illustrating the proposed solution in action.

  • Does the demo effectively showcase the solution’s core functionality?
  • How complete is the prototype (what works vs. what’s simulated)?
  • Can the prototype handle realistic test cases?
  • How intuitive is the user interface/experience?
  • Has the prototype been tested with potential users?

Appropriate technical component (20%)

Teams must show that GenAI technology is effectively and appropriately used for the problem.

  • How specifically does the solution leverage GenAI capabilities?
  • Why is GenAI particularly suited for addressing this problem?
  • Which specific GenAI models or techniques are being implemented?
  • How does this approach improve upon non-AI alternatives?
  • What technical limitations exist, and how have they been addressed?
  • How efficiently does the implementation use computational resources?

Feasibility and impact (20%)

Teams must convincing argue that the solution is realistic to implement and likely to make a meaningful social impact.

  • What is the business model or pla
  • Is the solution practically implementable given real-world constraints?
  • How will target users access and adopt the solution?
  • What metrics will measure impact?
  • What is the potential scale of impact (number of beneficiaries)?
  • What implementation challenges are anticipated?
  • Has the team developed a realistic timeline for deployment?

Sustainability and ethics (20%)

Teams must show the solution is designed for long-term sustainability and state its ethical implications. 

  • Does the business model or plan support this solution long-term.
  • Is the solution scalable, adaptable, or has potential for integration with existing systems or processes 
  • How will this project be financially sustained?
  • What potential ethical concerns (e.g. bias, privacy, and accessibility, unintended consequences) exist with this GenAI implementation?
  • How has feedback from affected communities been incorporated?
  • Does the solution empower users rather than creating dependencies?
Copyright © 2025 GenAI Hackathon for SDGs Inspiro Theme by WPZOOM